Make My Home Page | Subscribe | Bookmark (ctl + d)
Home Facebook Myspace About

Lindsay Lohan Demonstrates How to ‘Blow’ $7 Million

Posted on: October 16th, 2007bumpshack

Pretty on the Outside: Lindsay Lohan Blows

David from Pretty on the Outside illustrates how Lindsay Lohan was able to blow $7 million dollars in the past year.  If Lindsay had a brain, or a good accountant, she would only be snorting the interest on $7 million bucks.

At a very modest 6%, the interest on $7 million dollars would be $420,000.  That breaks down to  $1,150.68 a day for cocaine.  As a human, if you can’t live on $1,150.68 dollars a day for anything and everything then you probably deserve to lose it all.



Related Posts

Coke, Booze, Lindsay Lohan, Coke, Booze
More Lindsay Lohan Spin Control Than a Top
Lindsay Lohan Claims She’s ‘Innocent’
Is Lindsay Lohan Un-Insurable?
Lindsay Lohan Broke, In Need of Cash
Lindsay Lohan Sex Tape a Fake

4 comments:

  1. Gravatar
    		 dailystab.com (Pingback) | October 16th, 2007 17:22

    [...] Lindsay Lohan demonstrates how to ‘blow’ $7 million - BS [...]

     
  2. Gravatar
    		 The Bastardly Morning Report - The Bastardly (Pingback) | October 17th, 2007 7:29

    [...] Blow [...]

     
  3. Gravatar
    		 PK | October 17th, 2007 9:44

    How do you know she is broke are u her accountant? You should really report things as rumor and not fact you could be held libel.

     
  4. Gravatar
    		 bumpshack | October 17th, 2007 11:43

    I don’t have to be her accountant. Perhaps you should do some research on what libel of a public figure actually is. Larry Flynt in Penthouse magazine ran a cartoon that implied that Jerry Falwell had an incestuous first sexual encounter with his mom in an outhouse. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Flynt because Falwell was a public figure.

    For further explanation from Injury Legal Law Free Advice

    Public figures have a more difficult time proving defamation. Politicians or celebrities are understood to take some risk in being before the public eye and many of them profit by their public persona. A celebrity must prove that the party defaming them knew the statements were false, made them with actual malice, or was negligent in saying or writing them. Proving these elements can be an uphill battle.

     

Write a comment: