<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin&#8217;s TOO Sexy &amp; Controversial Newsweek Cover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bumpshack.com/2009/11/16/sarah-palins-too-sexy-controversial-newsweek-cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bumpshack.com/2009/11/16/sarah-palins-too-sexy-controversial-newsweek-cover/</link>
	<description>Where the News Always Bumps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:09:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://bumpshack.com/2009/11/16/sarah-palins-too-sexy-controversial-newsweek-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-1754319</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bumpshack.com/?p=36692#comment-1754319</guid>
		<description>Get back to me when Ms. Clinton, or any woman running for office, looks that good in a 
pair of shorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get back to me when Ms. Clinton, or any woman running for office, looks that good in a<br />
pair of shorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Fay Friedman: Family Guy vs. Sarah Palin Down&#8217;s Syndrome Controversy (VIDEOS) &#124; Bumpshack.com</title>
		<link>http://bumpshack.com/2009/11/16/sarah-palins-too-sexy-controversial-newsweek-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-1609020</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Fay Friedman: Family Guy vs. Sarah Palin Down&#8217;s Syndrome Controversy (VIDEOS) &#124; Bumpshack.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bumpshack.com/?p=36692#comment-1609020</guid>
		<description>[...] on Family Guy’s Valentine’s Day episode, responds to the critics made by former Alaska Governor and former VP candidate Sarah Palin. According to Sarah, Family Guy was mocking special needs children and her son Trig, who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Family Guy’s Valentine’s Day episode, responds to the critics made by former Alaska Governor and former VP candidate Sarah Palin. According to Sarah, Family Guy was mocking special needs children and her son Trig, who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://bumpshack.com/2009/11/16/sarah-palins-too-sexy-controversial-newsweek-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-1472450</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bumpshack.com/?p=36692#comment-1472450</guid>
		<description>newsweek needs to get a life.  It seems real convenient for newsweek to forget to mention that they stole that picture from runner&#039;s world.  That picture is very appropriate for runner&#039;s world.  The magazine the picture was intended for.  newsweeks only intention was to try to make Sarah look stupid, but in the end nesweek looks stupid.  I will vote for Sarah Palin every chance that I have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>newsweek needs to get a life.  It seems real convenient for newsweek to forget to mention that they stole that picture from runner&#8217;s world.  That picture is very appropriate for runner&#8217;s world.  The magazine the picture was intended for.  newsweeks only intention was to try to make Sarah look stupid, but in the end nesweek looks stupid.  I will vote for Sarah Palin every chance that I have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fayfield</title>
		<link>http://bumpshack.com/2009/11/16/sarah-palins-too-sexy-controversial-newsweek-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-1471474</link>
		<dc:creator>fayfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bumpshack.com/?p=36692#comment-1471474</guid>
		<description>I think Sarah Palin looks great. I think Newsweek should post pictures of Obama smoking pot in his college days and maybe Clinton in the Oval office, In fact, there are many pictures, of Politicans ,that can be posted that are much more exciting than Sarah Palin in shorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Sarah Palin looks great. I think Newsweek should post pictures of Obama smoking pot in his college days and maybe Clinton in the Oval office, In fact, there are many pictures, of Politicans ,that can be posted that are much more exciting than Sarah Palin in shorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dweb</title>
		<link>http://bumpshack.com/2009/11/16/sarah-palins-too-sexy-controversial-newsweek-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-1470580</link>
		<dc:creator>dweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bumpshack.com/?p=36692#comment-1470580</guid>
		<description>Sarah&#039;s now claiming the cover is &quot;sexist?&quot;

Uh, who allowed the photo spread in shorts to be taken less than four months ago, seems more than happy to strike all sorts of poses and stretches while wearing the infamous tights.

You had nearly four months since they were taken to 

A - Refuse to participate in the first place because having you pose in tights isn&#039;t becoming for someone who recently ran for Vice President and apparently is interested in getting in the election battle next time around.

or B - complain between then and now that the resulting photos were &quot;sexist.&quot;

Nope,  NOW we claim they are sexist.

I&#039;m going to get my protractor and go back over to FOX so I find out exactly what angle of bowing constitutes &quot;subservient behaviour&quot; on the part of our President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah&#8217;s now claiming the cover is &#8220;sexist?&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh, who allowed the photo spread in shorts to be taken less than four months ago, seems more than happy to strike all sorts of poses and stretches while wearing the infamous tights.</p>
<p>You had nearly four months since they were taken to </p>
<p>A &#8211; Refuse to participate in the first place because having you pose in tights isn&#8217;t becoming for someone who recently ran for Vice President and apparently is interested in getting in the election battle next time around.</p>
<p>or B &#8211; complain between then and now that the resulting photos were &#8220;sexist.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope,  NOW we claim they are sexist.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to get my protractor and go back over to FOX so I find out exactly what angle of bowing constitutes &#8220;subservient behaviour&#8221; on the part of our President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin&#8217;s Newsweek Cover &#187; Right Celebrity</title>
		<link>http://bumpshack.com/2009/11/16/sarah-palins-too-sexy-controversial-newsweek-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-1469321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin&#8217;s Newsweek Cover &#187; Right Celebrity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bumpshack.com/?p=36692#comment-1469321</guid>
		<description>[...] what apparently makes Newsweek&#8217;s cover so controversial is the headline that reads, &#8220;How Do You Solve a Problem Like Sarah? Ha! Well, obviously, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what apparently makes Newsweek&#8217;s cover so controversial is the headline that reads, &#8220;How Do You Solve a Problem Like Sarah? Ha! Well, obviously, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Holmes</title>
		<link>http://bumpshack.com/2009/11/16/sarah-palins-too-sexy-controversial-newsweek-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-1468417</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bumpshack.com/?p=36692#comment-1468417</guid>
		<description>Too sexy? She looks just fine to me!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too sexy? She looks just fine to me!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 303/304 objects using apc

Served from: bumpshack.com @ 2012-05-27 16:08:58 -->
